1988 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Renault Espace
To start off, 2009 Renault Espace is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Espace (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 929. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Espace should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Espace weights approximately 470 kg more than 1988 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Espace (330 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 929. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 929. 2009 Renault Espace has automatic transmission and 1988 Mazda 929 has manual transmission. 1988 Mazda 929 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Renault Espace will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Mazda 929 | 2009 Renault Espace | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 929 | Espace |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 239 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 81.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |
