1988 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1988 Mercury Sable.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Mercury Sable | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Sable | XC90 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1897 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |