1988 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Mitsubishi Magna (112 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 330 kg more than 1988 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mitsubishi Magna. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Mitsubishi Magna | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Magna | C-Max |
Year Released | 1988 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2788 mm |