1988 Nissan Cedric vs. 1980 Seat 131
To start off, 1988 Nissan Cedric is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Nissan Cedric (90 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 505 kg more than 1980 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Nissan Cedric (173 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1988 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Nissan Cedric | 1980 Seat 131 | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Cedric | 131 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2500 mm |