1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1990 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1990 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 470 kg more than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1990 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1990 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Skoda |
Model | Cutlass | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1988 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |