1988 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Opel Omega (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1988 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Opel Omega | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Omega | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |