1988 Plymouth Colt vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Colt (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Plymouth Colt (191 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1988 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Plymouth Colt | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Plymouth | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 3 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2650 mm |