1988 Plymouth Colt vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V50 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1988 Plymouth Colt. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1988 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 269 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V50 (320 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Plymouth Colt. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Plymouth Colt | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | V50 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2650 mm |
