1988 Plymouth Colt vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Colt (133 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Plymouth Colt (191 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1988 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Plymouth Colt | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Plymouth | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2400 mm |