1988 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Symbol is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Colt (133 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Renault Symbol. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 130 kg more than 2010 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Plymouth Colt (191 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (148 Nm). This means 1988 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Plymouth | Renault |
| Model | Colt | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2473 mm |
