1988 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 200 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Plymouth Sundance | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Plymouth | Suzuki |
| Model | Sundance | Equator |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
