1988 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 646 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Plymouth Sundance | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
Model | Sundance | CTS |
Year Released | 1988 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |