1988 Renault 19 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1988 Renault 19 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,763 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault 19 (140 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 158 kg more than 1988 Renault 19.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Renault 19 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 19 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1763 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1052 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
