1988 Renault 19 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1988 Renault 19 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Renault 19 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Renault 19 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 19 | Celica |
Year Released | 1988 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |