1988 Renault 25 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault 25 (180 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 260 kg more than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Renault 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 25. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Renault 25 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 25 | Celica |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2440 mm |