1988 Renault Megane vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1988 Renault Megane. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1988 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 1988 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Renault Megane | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Renault | Mazda |
| Model | Megane | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 273 HP |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
