1988 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 330 kg more than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Toyota 4Runner (189 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1988 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Toyota 4Runner | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | 4Runner | CR-V |
Year Released | 1988 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 189 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |