1988 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Ford C-Max

To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 455 kg more than 2012 Ford C-Max.

Because 1988 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford C-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. (189 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Toyota 4Runner.

Compare all specifications:

1988 Toyota 4Runner 2012 Ford C-Max
Make Toyota Ford
Model 4Runner C-Max
Year Released 1988 2012
Body Type SUV Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2446 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 189 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1830 kg 1375 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1828 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1626 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2648 mm