1988 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 1989 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1989 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 260 kg more than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Toyota Lite Ace | 1989 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | Lite Ace | Polo |
Year Released | 1988 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1270 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |