1988 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC weights approximately 1730 kg more than 1988 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC has automatic transmission and 1988 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Toyota Lite Ace | 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLC | |
Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Lite Ace | CLC |
Year Released | 1988 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |