1988 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR weights approximately 275 kg more than 1988 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Mitsubishi RVR | |
| Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lite Ace | RVR |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4295 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1631 mm |
