1989 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000. (127 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1087 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000 has manual transmission. 1989 Alfa Romeo 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | 62 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 79 L |