1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 180 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | RZ | K2 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
