1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 735 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | RZ | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3390 mm |
