1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 20 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | RZ | E Type |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
