1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 396 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
| Model | RZ | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2430 mm |
