1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1976 Mini MK III
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 770 kg more than 1976 Mini MK III.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK III. (61 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1976 Mini MK III | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
| Model | RZ | MK III |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2040 mm |
