1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 430 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | RZ | Lynx |
Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2400 mm |