1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 189 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | RZ | Cavalier |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 2189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |
