1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 325 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | RZ | Grand Voyager |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 2428 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 227 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3040 mm |
