1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2000 BMW Z3
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (210 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2000 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | RZ | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 2171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 224 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
