1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Volvo S40.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S40 (298 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | RZ | S40 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |
