1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 640 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
Model | RZ | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2958 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 2630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1810 mm |