1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 212 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | RZ | CTS |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2890 mm |
