1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2004 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2004 Cadillac XLR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 260 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac XLR (408 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2004 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | RZ | XLR |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2958 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 408 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 84 mm |
Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |