1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 437 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (215 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | RZ | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2958 cc | 2427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2660 mm |