1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 145 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (240 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RZ | CLK |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2860 mm |
