1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2005 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Smart ForTwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 565 kg more than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2005 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Smart |
| Model | RZ | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 2510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1820 mm |
