1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | RZ | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |