1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2006 Renault Megane
To start off, 2006 Renault Megane is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Megane (300 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2006 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2006 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
| Model | RZ | Megane |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |
