1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2006 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Swift is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 335 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Swift.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Swift. (116 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2006 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
Model | RZ | Swift |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2958 cc | 1328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 116 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 69.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2390 mm |