1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 761 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2011 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2011 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | RZ | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 186 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2141 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
