1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 335 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro has automatic transmission and 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ has manual transmission. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | RZ | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 323 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4836 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2852 mm |
