1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 6,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 350 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (601 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RZ | C |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 6300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 445 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 601 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4707 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |
