1989 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Because 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ. (244 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | RZ | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2958 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4807 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2857 mm |
