1989 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Alfa Romeo Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Spider | XC90 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2860 mm |