1989 Alpina B 10 vs. 1994 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1994 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alpina B 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alpina B 10 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Alpina B 10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alpina B 10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alpina B 10 (705 Nm) has 577 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volkswagen Polo. (128 Nm). This means 1989 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Alpina B 10 | 1994 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alpina | Volkswagen |
Model | B 10 | Polo |
Year Released | 1989 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 705 Nm | 128 Nm |
Top Speed | 291 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |