1989 Aston Martin Virage vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Aston Martin Virage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Aston Martin Virage would be higher. At 5,339 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Aston Martin Virage. (450 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Aston Martin Virage.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Aston Martin Virage | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
| Model | Virage | HRT |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5339 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 344 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 255 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
