1989 Audi 100 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1989 Audi 100 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1989 Audi 100. (163 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 820 kg more than 1989 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 100 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
