1989 Audi 100 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1989 Audi 100 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 100 (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1975 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Nissan Cedric (127 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1975 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1989 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |